It is often pointed out that one of the major problems with social networking is the blurring of lines between the private and public.
Sure, it was funny when you passed out on the floor at the party, and even more so when your friend uploaded the photos to Facebook – but do you also want your boss seeing that? Or your mom?
A CareerBuilder.com survey published last week shows that 20% of employers are now researching social networks when considering job candidates:
“Top areas for concern among these hiring managers included:
- 41% – candidate posted information about them drinking or using drugs
- 40% – candidate posted provocative or inappropriate photographs or information
- 29% – candidate had poor communication skills”
It’s very easy to forget in the ever-connected world that anyone can see what you’re doing – as Lyn found out recently – and it’s more important than ever to watch what is said or posted about you online.
However, even more worrying for me, is when people deliberately publish something which would be better left private.
That is why I was stunned by something I read about the Rocky Mountain News yesterday. A tragic accident in Colorado led to an illegal immigrant killing two women and a toddler. Naturally it was a high-profile incident that generated a lot of public interest, but how clueless did the editor have to be to think that live Twittering the funeral of a three year old would be a good idea!?
“RMN_Berny: family members shovel earth into grave
Wednesday, Sep. 10, 11:40 a.m.
RMN_Berny: rabbi calls end to ceremony
Wednesday, Sep. 10, 11:28 a.m.
RMN_Berny: rabbi chanting final prayer in hebrew
Wednesday, Sep. 10, 11:27 a.m.
RMN_Berny: earth being placed on coffin.
Wednesday, Sep. 10, 11:22 a.m.”
Naturally this has upset many people. Michael Roberts at Denver Westworld Blogs, called it “self-satirizing in the most morbid, inappropriate way possible.” The Guardian (UK) said it was “Going straight to the top of our Inappropriate Use of Technology chart”, while Samuel Freenman, professor of Journalism at Columbia University said, in something of an understatement,
“A memorial service for a murdered, for a slain child is not a fit subject for play-by-play updates”
So, why did they do it? Basically because they could. The same ease which allows you to tell the world how drunk you got last night without thinking of the consequences, allowed the reporters to overlook whether or not what they were doing was actually a good idea.
There is a lesson here for all of us: In an online world, just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.